Highlights
Part 1 (Peer Review) consists of a critical review. Previously I sent out by email samples of published scholarly reviews (also posted to Canvas).
Smart advice: study those samples closely.
The purpose of a critical review is simple: critique a fellow researcher's scholarship (meaning: how well they think and make use of evidence) as well as their presentation of that scholarship (meaning: how well they write). Hence you analyze their argument and assess its overall significance and quality. Remember: you are every bit an expert on the subject--or close to it--as the author of your paper. Demonstrate your expertise by critiquing that of the author's.
Attached to this email are five papers submitted by your classmates for the Paper 2 assignment. The files are also posted to Canvas.
You'll select ONE paper* then write a 3+ page (double-spaced) analysis in which you:
a. Summarize the paper's topic and basic argument.
Is the argument equal to the topic? Or does the argument not quite measure up? Demonstrate your expertise on the matter. After all, you are something of an expert: you too (like the author of the paper you are reviewing) submitted a paper for the Paper 2 assignment in this course.
b. Relate whether or not you found the paper to be persuasive and why or why not.
This step might include enumerating the paper's strengths, then highlighting weaknesses, while finally measuring the balance. Presumably a persuasive paper has more strengths than weaknesses.
c. Provide suggestions--especially regarding logic of argument and use of evidence--that would strengthen the author's argument.
Unless the paper is perfect, there's room for improvement. The objective of a persuasive and effective review is to highlight just how much room...a task that obviously requires the reviewer to know what he or she is talking about. So show that you do.
These points are especially true concerning evidence. Did the author use all the evidence provided? All the evidence required? (I attach the Paper 2 prompt instructions for reference.)
d. Finally, analyze the paper in light of one additional consideration.
This Report Writing Assignment has been solved by our Report Writing Experts at My Uni Papers. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2025 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.