Implementing a Workflow in Pega: Report and Pre-recorded Assignment

Assignment Task

This individual assignment is worth 30% of the overall mark for the unit. Both the Implementation in Pega (worth 25%) and the Pre-recorded presentation (worth 5%) are due on the same day . Please check the unit outline for late penalties.

The assignment work must be demonstrated in a pre-recorded video showing the presenter talking to the slides. The video is to be submitted through canvas. Failure to submit a will result in 0 marks for this assignment, and an inability to adequately demonstrate features of your assignment will also result in a deduction of marks. Students must ensure they are familiar with the recording system as failure to upload a recorded presentation before the due date will not be grounds for seeking an extension to this part of the assignment.

Part I – Report describing an implementation workflow in Pega

All submissions need to be electronic submissions through Canvas before the due date.

The submission should consist of the following:

• One individual report submission, containing the (a) individual cover sheet, and (b) individual report. The individual cover sheet is to be submitted as either a .docx or a .pdf file, following the “Individual Assignment Cover Sheet” template available in the Assignment Resources module on Canvas.
  • The report is to be submitted as either a .docx or a .pdf file.

• One individual presentation submission, containing the (a) individual cover sheet, and (b) the recording of the presentation.
• The 3 minutes recorded presentation for 11481 (UG) and 5 minutes recorded presentation for 11529 (PG) is to be submitted as an Mp4 or Wmv.

Choosing a business process or case for this assignment

The assignment should describe the workflow of a business process or case. The process you choose must meet the following criteria:

1. Must be a business process
2. Must involve business-side processing
3. Must involve user or client interaction with the business
4. Must involve at least one decision point during the process

These criteria must be clearly met through the description and model for the process. Assignments that do not meet the above criteria will be penalised -25% of the available marks of the assignment (-7.5 marks) for each criterion not met.

You can use your group’s business process as described in Assignment 1 for this assignment. This means that group members might all build the same business process in Pega, but each individual should build their own implementation in Pega and write their own report . You can, if you wish, choose a different business process or case to use in this assignment compared to Assignment 1. However, your new case still must satisfy the same criteria. If you choose to use a different example to the one your group used in Assignment 1, you may wish to provide some additional description and modelling to clarify your process for marking purposes, as the marker will not be able to refer back to your group’s Assignment 1 for clarification. This additional description and modelling should be attached as additional reference material, as it does not directly form a part of the assessable content of this assignment and thus should not be included in the report and the page limit of the report.

Although they satisfy the criteria above, you cannot choose any of the examples provided in the Pega System Architect Essential Student or Exercise guides. Assignments which use these, or significantly similar business processes or cases will receive 0 marks for the entire assignment.

Except for individuals from the same group for Assignment 1, please also note that individuals should choose different business processes or cases for this assignment. As this is an individual assignment, it is inappropriate for two or more people to collaborate using the same business process or case. Any assignments that use the same or significantly similar business processes or cases as another (excluding those by students from the same Assignment 1 group) will be questioned and potentially dealt with under the University’s academic misconduct policies.

Contents of assignment

Executive summary

The executive summary should cover all the main points in your assignment. Note that an executive summary is not an introduction, and it is not just a summary. The executive summary is to be read on its own and should stand by itself as a succinct version of your complete assignment. A good way to think about the executive summary is that it is a cover letter or cliff notes version of your assignment – containing the main and important details of your full assignment.

The executive summary should be a maximum of one (1) page in length. Given the requirement for an executive summary to be readable by itself, I strongly advise that you use all this available length.

The executive summary is not marked separately from the remainder of the assignment and is primarily used as a marking aid so that markers know what to expect in the remainder of your assignment. The overall quality of the executive summary will be considered in the formatting and style marks.

For this assignment, a good way of writing your executive summary may be to list and briefly describe how your implementation in Pega meets the criteria set out in the assignment.

Instructions for implementing in Pega

• Create a new branch, and ensure that you are using the same branch for the whole assignment
• Use the username howar and Password rules to log in to Pega, start a new branch and then you will be able to implement your process. This operator ID has permissions and rights to everything in the exercise instance, so you should not run into any permissions issues.
• Start with building a case. Do not worry about creating a new application for your Assignment 2 – application and ruleset organisation is the responsibility of Lead System Architects and Senior System Architects, not the responsibility of Business Architects (which is what you are learning to do).
• Use the default ruleset and Ruleset version 01-01-01. Do not worry about creating a new ruleset.
• Use existing operators for assignment routing . For advanced users, you can try copying one of the existing operator IDs and changing the name and email address, but I do not advise trying to create a new operator ID from scratch as you need to get the ruleset access and versions exactly correct otherwise you will run into issues.

This Arts and Humanities has been solved by our PhD Experts at My Uni Papers.