SEV300 : Reinforced Concrete and Steel Structures Design Report Assessment 3

Assignment Overview

1. Introduction

The Steel Design Project allows students to understand the significance of material properties in structural design. Students will continue working in teams to produce design deliverables similar to those used for concrete structures, but now addressing steel structural elements under a new set of design rules.

• The six-story building from the Concrete Design Assessment will serve as the basis for design modifications.

• Relevant code: AS 4100 – 1998: Steel Structures.

• Students must design:

  • Beam: The same continuous beam used in the concrete assignment.

  • Column: One internal column supporting the designated beam at the ground floor level.

• Students are expected to make individual engineering and design judgments . This is an individual submission , though teamwork is encouraged for learning purposes.

2. Deliverables

The final report shall include:

• Detailed design of the allocated column and beam , including all required strength limit state checks .

• A single report per student (max 25 pages, including title page and references).

• Relevant design calculations, sketches, and a design summary , with emphasis on critical evaluation of design options.

• Completion of the detailed design is an individual task .

• Weighting: 30% of the total unit mark.

• Due date: Sunday, 5 October 2025, 8:00 pm AEDT via Canvas.

• Hurdle requirement: Students must achieve 50% in the Steel Design Assessment to pass the unit.

3. Final Report Content

Report items and details:

1. Frontpage

   • Project title and student’s name.

2. Table of Contents

   • Number all pages.

3. Introduction

   • Brief, project-specific overview.

   • Include relevant assumptions used in the design process.

4. Design of Column

   • AS4100-1998 compliant.

   • Include design summary and sketches .

   • Use design tables from steel manufacturers if required.

5. Design of Beam

   • AS4100-1998 compliant.

   • Include design summary and sketches .

   • Use design tables from steel manufacturers if required.

6. Critical Reflection on Design Outcomes

   • Evaluate relative merits and demerits of the design options.

4. Analysis and Detailed Design

• Column Design:

  • Follow AS4100-1998 rules.

  • Include checks for section capacity and member capacity .

  • Columns are designed for axial compression only .

  • Present at least three design options :

    1. Open section, both ends hinged

    2. Closed section, both ends hinged

    3. Combination of section and restraint type (including intermediate restraints)

  • Select the most economical design option .

• Beam Design:

  • Include checks for section classification, section capacity, and member capacity .

  • Provide recommendations for restraints as required.

  • Present at least three design options , including:

    • One UB section

    • One UC section

    • Variations in support conditions, material type/grade, or other feasible alternatives.

• General Notes:

  • Standard steel sections from manufacturers like One Steel, Bao Steel, Tata Steel Europe may be used.

  • Justify final design choices and explore alternative options .

  • Include all calculations with appropriate units .

  • Provide typical calculations to support any software outputs.

5. Assessment Guidelines

• Reports should be concise and free of redundant information .

• Submissions before the due date are considered timely.

• Late submissions are subject to Faculty and University guidelines.

Suggested Table of Contents (without a table)

1. Frontpage

2. Table of Contents

3. Introduction

4. Design of Column

5. Design of Beam

6. Critical Reflection on Design Outcomes

7. References

Assessment Requirements – Summary

The Steel Design Project focuses on individual engineering judgment in designing steel structural elements for a six-story building previously analyzed for concrete. Key requirements include:

1. Design Components

   • Column: One internal column at ground floor supporting the designated beam.

   • Beam: Same continuous beam used in the concrete design project.

   • Both must comply with AS 4100-1998 Steel Structures code.

2. Deliverables

   • Individual report (max 25 pages) including:

     • Design calculations, sketches, and design summary.

     • Critical evaluation of at least three design options for both beam and column.

   • Weighting: 30% of total unit mark.

   • Hurdle requirement: Minimum 50% to pass the unit.

3. Report Content

   • Frontpage, Table of Contents, Introduction with design assumptions.

   • Column and Beam design details (calculations, sketches, design summary).

   • Critical reflection comparing merits and demerits of design options.

   • References and proper APA-style citations for any sources.

4. Design Analysis Expectations

   • Columns designed for axial compression, presenting options such as open/closed sections and restraint types.

   • Beams designed with section classification checks and at least three options considering UB/UC sections, support variations, and material grades.

   • Final design choices must be justified with calculations and, where applicable, manufacturer design tables.

Academic Mentor’s Step-by-Step Guidance

Step 1: Understanding Assessment Objectives

The mentor first explained the goal of the project: to apply steel design principles using AS 4100-1998 and understand material behavior, design limits, and practical engineering judgment. The student was encouraged to identify key differences between steel and concrete design.

Step 2: Report Planning and Structure

The mentor advised creating a clear report outline based on the suggested structure: Frontpage → Introduction → Column Design → Beam Design → Critical Reflection → References. Emphasis was placed on conciseness and avoiding redundant content.

Step 3: Column Design Approach

• The student was guided to generate at least three design options: open section hinged, closed section hinged, and combined section with restraint variations.

• Mentor emphasized:

  • Checking section and member capacity.

  • Using standard steel sections from manufacturers.

  • Documenting all calculations and assumptions clearly.

• Step-by-step calculations were reviewed and validated for accuracy.

Step 4: Beam Design Approach

• Mentor instructed the student to evaluate at least three beam options, including UB and UC sections, with variations in support and material grade.

• Recommendations for restraints and compliance with AS 4100 were incorporated.

• Use of design tables and verification of software outputs were emphasized.

Step 5: Critical Reflection

• Mentor encouraged comparison of all design options, highlighting:

  • Economic efficiency.

  • Structural performance.

  • Practicality and ease of implementation.

• The student learned to justify final selections and discuss alternative approaches.

Step 6: Finalization and Referencing

• The mentor guided proper referencing using APA 7th edition.

• The student checked report formatting, page numbering, and clarity of expression.

• Emphasis was on concise presentation and professional engineering writing.

Outcome and Learning Objectives Achieved

Outcome:

• The student produced a comprehensive, individual steel design report that included detailed calculations, sketches, and evaluation of multiple design options.

• Final selections were economically and structurally justified, with reflection on alternative approaches.

Learning Objectives Covered:

1. Apply AS 4100-1998 steel design principles to real structural elements.

2. Understand material properties and structural behavior for columns and beams.

3. Develop critical evaluation skills by comparing multiple design options.

4. Enhance engineering report writing with structured calculations, sketches, and APA-compliant referencing.

5. Gain experience in individual engineering judgment within a collaborative learning environment.

6. Improve decision-making and justification skills for design selections.

Achieve Academic Success with Expert Assignment Guidance

Looking for a clear example to guide your work? You can download this sample solution to see how assignments are structured, analyzed, and referenced. Remember: this sample is for reference and learning purposes only. Submitting it as your own work may result in plagiarism penalties.

If you want a fresh, original, and plagiarism-free solution, our team of professional academic writers can create one tailored to your specific assignment requirements. Ordering a custom solution ensures:

• 100% original, plagiarism-free content written from scratch.

• Accurate, evidence-based analysis with credible academic sources.

• Correct formatting and citations aligned with your university guidelines.

• Timely delivery to meet your deadlines.

• Clear, professional explanations to help you understand your topic.

Disclaimer: This sample solution is strictly for study and reference purposes. Using it as your own work may violate academic integrity policies.

Download Sample Solution            Order Fresh Assignment