SBI241: Case Study Instructions Assessment

A clinical case study will be provided to you (related to kidney disease) and a couple of questions will be asked. You will have to do scientific literature search to answer the questions.

Support your answers with appropriate evidence (references). This assignment tests your ability to search scientific literature and present your answer in a scientific language. CDU library has heaps of resources to support you. Please make full use of these helpful resources:

• Tips on academic/scientific writing:
• Avoiding plagiarism:
• APA referencing guide
• General Guidelines on how to write your assignment

The word range for this assignment is between 800 words, this does not include references. Please stick to word limit, failing to do so will result in losing marks. Do not copy the case study details in your submission, just provide your answers.

1. Only word and pdf formats are acceptable (formats like “.pages” are NOT acceptable).
2. This assignment must be submitted via Turnitin on Learnline.
3. No COVER PAGE required.
4. Proof reading or feedback of any kind of ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS will not be provided prior to submission.
5. Please contact the Learnline technical support if you have problems submitting the assignment.

Formate:

1. Font size 12; Font type: preferably Calibri or Arial.
2. Line spacing 1.5 to 2.

 

Extention:

You will have to submit an official extension request with supporting documents at least 5 days before the deadline.

Assignment mark:

It is expected to take around 2 weeks to get your assignment marks being released after submission deadline.

Assessment Requirements

This assessment requires students to respond to questions based on a clinical case study related to kidney disease. Students must conduct a scientific literature search to develop evidence-based answers and present them in clear academic/scientific language.

Key assessment expectations include:

• Students must not copy the case study into their submission : only responses to the questions should be included.

• Responses must be supported with credible scientific references using APA referencing style.

• Word limit: 800 words (excluding references) : marks may be deducted for exceeding the limit.

• The assignment must be written in a formal academic tone, avoiding plagiarism and following CDU academic integrity rules.

• Submission format:

  • File type: Word or PDF only

  • Font size 12

  • Font style Calibri or Arial

  • Line spacing 1.5–2

• Submission must be uploaded via Turnitin on Learnline.

• No cover page is required.

• Proofreading or pre-submission feedback on answers will not be provided.

• Extension requests must be submitted at least 5 days prior to the deadline with supporting documentation.

• Assessment marks are expected within two weeks after submission deadline.

Students are encouraged to use CDU Library resources, writing guides, APA referencing support, and plagiarism-avoidance tools.

How the Academic Mentor Guided the Student 

The Academic Mentor supported the student through a structured, scaffolded learning and writing process, ensuring alignment with assessment standards and learning objectives.

Step 1 : Understanding the Case Study and Clarifying Task Requirements

The mentor first helped the student:

• interpret the case study scenario

• identify the clinical focus (kidney disease pathology and patient context)

• review the assessment rubric and marking criteria

• highlight what the questions were asking (content depth, analysis, evidence use)

The student was guided to break down each question into:

• key clinical concepts

• biomedical processes involved

• areas requiring research evidence

This helped the student avoid narrative retelling and instead focus on critical scientific explanation.

Step 2 : Developing a Scientific Literature Search Strategy

The mentor demonstrated how to:

• search peer-reviewed databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar)

• use keywords related to:

  • kidney physiology

  • renal disease mechanisms

  • evidence-based interventions

• filter results for:

  • recency (last 5–10 years where applicable)

  • clinical relevance

  • systematic reviews and journal articles

The mentor reinforced evaluating sources for credibility, validity, and reliability.

Students were encouraged to prioritise:

• clinical research

• medical guidelines

• academic journals

rather than general websites or non-scholarly sources.

Step 3 : Structuring the Scientific Responses

The Academic Mentor guided the student to present responses in a logical, scientific format:

For each question:

1. Introduce the concept briefly

2. Explain underlying pathophysiology or clinical mechanism

3. Link explanation to case study context

4. Support arguments with literature evidence

5. Paraphrase appropriately to avoid plagiarism

The mentor emphasised:

• concise explanation aligned to the word limit

• integrating citations within the discussion

• maintaining scientific tone and terminology

Step 4 : Referencing and Academic Integrity

The mentor ensured the student understood:

• APA in-text citation style

• reference list formatting

• paraphrasing techniques

• avoiding direct copying

The student was guided to:

• cross-check references with APA guide

• ensure all cited sources appeared in reference list

• keep Turnitin similarity within acceptable range

This strengthened understanding of ethical academic practice.

Step 5 : Final Draft Review and Self-Editing

Rather than proofreading content, the mentor guided the student through self-review strategies, including:

• checking word count compliance

• ensuring clarity and coherence

• confirming alignment with learning outcomes

• verifying formatting standards (font, spacing, file type)

The mentor reinforced the importance of:

• scientific clarity

• evidence-based justification

• structured academic writing style

How the Assessment Objectives Were Achieved

Through this guided approach, the student was able to:

• conduct an independent scientific literature search

• interpret and apply kidney-related biomedical concepts

• present clinically relevant explanations

• integrate credible research evidence

• cite sources using APA style

• produce a structured scientific response within word limits

Learning Objectives Achieved

The assessment successfully supported development of:

• research and database searching skills

• academic and scientific writing proficiency

• evidence-based analytical thinking

• interpretation of clinical case studies

• ethical scholarship and plagiarism awareness

• application of biomedical knowledge to real-world health scenarios

Download This Assignment Sample

This academic assignment solution is provided to help you understand the assessment structure, research approach, and formatting expectations. The sample is meant strictly for reference, learning, and guidance purposes only. Submitting this file as your own work may lead to plagiarism penalties, academic misconduct issues, or Turnitin similarity flags. Always use the sample to improve your understanding not as a submission copy.

If you need a fresh, plagiarism-free solution written according to your university guidelines, our expert academic writers can prepare a custom-written assignment tailored to your topic, marking rubric, and referencing style.

Why Order a Fresh Custom Solution?

• 100% original, plagiarism-free work

• Written by qualified subject-matter experts

• Structured as per your university rubric

• Properly referenced (APA / Harvard / MLA / Chicago)

• Delivered on time with guaranteed quality

Our academic mentors ensure every solution is research-based, well-structured, and Turnitin-safe giving you full confidence in your submission.

Plagiarism Disclaimer:
The downloadable sample is provided for academic reference only. Do not submit it as your own work. Use it to understand concepts, structure, and writing style. For a unique submission, order a freshly written solution.

CTA Buttons:

Download Sample Solution  Order Fresh Assignment