PVVAL302A: Specialised and Government Valuation Assessment 3

Assessment Event 3: Development Report and Presentation

Provide a Development Report for the hypothetical subject property comparing the two proposed uses including information gathered in Assessments 1 & 2. Compare and contrast the development potential of the proposed uses. A 5 year cashflow must be provided. Provide a recommendation to the owner as to the preferred option based on net profit and return over the 5 year period.

Assumptions

• Build Cost - $450,000 per unit, Land Cost - $80,000 per unit 
• Management fees – Assume nil fees for the owner 
• Ongoing outgoings – Assume 15% of gross revenue 
• NDIS – Assumptions to be provided in class 
• Word limit – 5,000 words

To be provided in two parts with a written assessment to be submitted first, with a short presentation (defence) of the recommendation to follow during the final lecture. The Presentation (Defence) will include questions from the examiner from the Written Assessment and Presentation.

Academic Mentor’s Guidance and Step-by-Step Approach

The academic mentor guided the student through a systematic process to ensure clarity, analytical depth, and alignment with professional valuation and property development standards.

Step 1: Understanding the Brief and Objectives

The mentor first helped the student interpret the task brief and identify key deliverables financial modelling, comparison of uses, and strategic recommendation. The student was encouraged to review Assessments 1 and 2 to extract data on land value, zoning, design feasibility, and cost estimates, ensuring continuity across all assessment stages.

Step 2: Structuring the Development Report

The mentor outlined a clear structure for the report:

1. Introduction and project overview.
2. Description of both proposed uses and their market positioning.
3. Assumptions and methodology for financial evaluation.
4. Five-year cashflow projections for each scenario.
5. Comparative financial and qualitative analysis.
6. Final recommendation with justification.

The mentor emphasized presenting data in tables, charts, and cashflow models for transparency and easy interpretation.

Step 3: Preparing the Financial Model and Cashflow Analysis

The mentor guided the student in constructing a five-year cashflow statement incorporating all relevant assumptions build and land cost per unit, ongoing outgoings, and projected revenues.
Using standard valuation methods, the student calculated Net Profit, Net Present Value (NPV), and Return on Investment (ROI) for both development options to determine financial viability.

Step 4: Comparative Analysis of Development Options

Next, the mentor advised on using both quantitative and qualitative factors for comparison. Financial outcomes were complemented by considerations such as market demand, sustainability, risk exposure, and alignment with the owner’s long-term goals.

Step 5: Drafting the Recommendation

After analyzing both scenarios, the student was guided to craft a well-supported recommendation, clearly stating which development option offered better financial performance and strategic benefits. The mentor reviewed multiple drafts to ensure the argument was logical, evidence-based, and professionally worded.

Step 6: Preparing for the Presentation (Defence)

The mentor then conducted mock presentation sessions where the student practised summarising the findings concisely within the time limit.
Focus areas included:

• Presenting financial highlights clearly.
• Justifying assumptions confidently.
• Responding effectively to examiner questions.
  This rehearsal helped the student gain confidence and develop presentation skills expected in professional valuation contexts.

Outcome and Learning Objectives Achieved

By completing this assessment, the student achieved the following learning outcomes:

• Demonstrated ability to analyse and compare development feasibility using structured financial models.
• Applied professional valuation and reporting standards to prepare a formal development report.
• Developed practical skills in financial forecasting, data interpretation, and business communication.
• Strengthened ability to justify professional recommendations based on empirical data.
• Enhanced presentation and defence capabilities, crucial for professional stakeholder engagement.

Get Inspired by This Sample But Submit Your Own Original Work

Looking for ideas or structure guidance for your next assignment? You can download the sample solution provided here to understand how professional academic writing is structured, formatted, and referenced. Use it as a learning tool to strengthen your own writing and research approach.

However, please remember that this sample is for reference and educational purposes only. Submitting it directly as your own work may lead to plagiarism penalties under your institution’s academic integrity policies. Always create and submit original content based on your understanding.

If you need a plagiarism-free, custom-written assignment tailored to your topic and requirements, our team of qualified academic experts can help. You’ll receive a fully original paper written from scratch, properly referenced, and aligned with your university’s standards ensuring top-quality results and complete confidentiality.

Why Order a Fresh Custom Assignment?

• 100% plagiarism-free and written from scratch
• Tailored to your course, topic, and marking rubric
• Reviewed by academic mentors and quality experts
• Delivered on time with unlimited support

Disclaimer: The provided sample is strictly for study and reference use. Direct submission of this file as your own may breach academic integrity rules.

Download Sample Solution  Order Fresh Assignment