Research Essay (1, 800 words)
Please choose ONLY one question from A & B and work on the chosen question . Please be based and focus on only the provided materials and read through, refer to and quote from the following resources provided. And you also must have an access to read the materials.
Question A
Is phenomenal consciousness an illusion? Discuss in relation to Keith Frankish’s “Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness” and other relevant readings and lecture materials.
The following 5 Resources for Question A Read, based and Refer to, quote from the library reading lists provided below.
Question B
Can phenomenal consciousness be analysed in terms of intentionality? Discuss in relation to the debate between Amy Kind and Angela Mendelovici, and potentially other relevant readings and lecture materials
The following 5 Resources for Question B: Read, based and Refer to, quote from the library reading lists provided below.
Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind 2013 Book by Uriah Kriegel; Ebook . ( the main read) (Read Amy Kind, Chapter 5: The Case against Representationalism about Moods and Angela Mendelovici Chapter 6: Pure Intentionalism about Moods and Emotions (at least read chapter 5 and if you have time chapter 6 as well)
Write an 1,800-word (main text only) essay that answers just ONE of the questions given bel (which question you choose to answer is up to you).
Make sure to carefully read and follow the Guidelines given after the questions.
The assessment is a Research Essay (1,800 words) where students are required to choose only one question from the two options provided:
Question A:
Topic: “Is phenomenal consciousness an illusion?”
Focus: Discuss in relation to Keith Frankish’s “Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness” and other relevant readings and lecture materials.
Key Resources (must read, refer, and quote):
Frankish, Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
Special issue responses to Frankish’s paper in Journal of Consciousness Studies
Nagel, Is Consciousness an Illusion?, The New York Review of Books
Mandik, This is Philosophy of Mind (2013)
The Normative Challenge for Illusionist Views of Consciousness
Question B:
Topic: “Can phenomenal consciousness be analysed in terms of intentionality?”
Focus: Debate between Amy Kind and Angela Mendelovici and other relevant readings.
Key Resources (must read, refer, and quote):
Kriegel, Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind (Chapter 5 and 6)
Batty, Smelling Lessons, Philosophical Studies (2011-3)
Batty, A Representational Account of Olfactory Experience, Canadian Journal of Philosophy (2010)
Harman, The Intrinsic Quality of Experience, Philosophical Perspectives (1990)
Lycan, Representational Theories of Consciousness (2000/05/22)
General Requirements:
Word limit: 1,800 words (main text only)
Strictly use the provided materials
Quote and reference readings correctly
Follow guidelines provided after the questions
The Academic mentor first explained the difference between Question A and B, helping the student identify their interest and knowledge strengths.
Key guidance: choose one question, stick strictly to the provided readings, and understand the essay’s argument structure.
Mentor guided the student to thoroughly read each resource relevant to their chosen question.
Created summary notes for each reading: main argument, key points, supporting evidence, and counterpoints.
Recommended highlighting quotes and page numbers to streamline referencing later.
The mentor helped create an essay outline, ensuring all key points from readings were covered:
Introduction: Define phenomenal consciousness and outline the essay argument.
Main Body:
Section 1: Present the primary theory (Frankish’s Illusionism or Kind/Mendelovici debate)
Section 2: Discuss supporting and opposing viewpoints from readings
Section 3: Analyze and critically evaluate arguments
Conclusion: Summarize findings and present reasoned judgment
Mentor guided the student in writing each section step-by-step:
Introduction: Establish context, define terms, and present thesis.
Theoretical Discussion: Summarize core arguments from primary readings.
Critical Analysis: Compare and contrast views, include counterarguments.
Evidence Integration: Use quotes strategically to support points.
Conclusion: Tie arguments together, reaffirm thesis, and reflect on implications.
Mentor ensured coherence, flow, and academic tone.
Checked word count, referencing style, and alignment with guidelines.
Reviewed critical evaluation to ensure balanced discussion, not just summary.
A well-structured, 1,800-word research essay that:
Directly addressed the chosen question
Integrated all relevant readings with proper citations
Showed critical understanding of key philosophical arguments
Followed the provided guidelines and word limit
Critical analysis of complex philosophical theories
Effective use of academic sources for research-based writing
Essay planning and structured argumentation
Accurate referencing and citation skills
Synthesizing multiple perspectives into a coherent argument
Academic writing skills including clarity, conciseness, and logical flow
Looking for guidance on your assignment? Our sample solution is here to help you understand the structure, key points, and referencing style. Important: This sample is for reference only. Submitting it as your own work may lead to plagiarism penalties.
Want a guaranteed plagiarism-free solution tailored to your needs? Our team of professional academic writers can create a fresh, custom-written assignment that matches your requirements, meets academic standards, and helps you achieve top grades.
Benefits of Ordering a Fresh Solution:
100% original, plagiarism-free content
Customized to your assignment guidelines
Properly referenced and formatted
Expertly written by qualified academic writers
Saves time while ensuring academic integrity
Don’t risk your grades — choose the safe path!
Download Sample Solution Order Fresh Assignment
© Copyright 2025 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.