Throughout this unit, you will be expected to show your competency of the elements through observations or demonstrations. Your instructor will have a list of demonstrations you must complete or tasks to be observed. The observations and demonstrations will be completed as well as the activities found in this workbook. An explanation of demonstrations and observations:
Demonstration is off-the-job A demonstration will require:
Observation is on-the-job The observation will usually require:
Your instructor will inform you of which one of the above they would like you to do. The demonstration/observation will cover one of the unit’s elements.
The observation/demonstration will take place either in the workplace or the training environment, depending on the task to be undertaken and whether it is an observation or demonstration. Your instructor will ensure you are provided with the correct equipment and/or materials to complete the task. They will also inform you of how long you have to complete the task.
You must be able to demonstrate essential knowledge required to effectively do the task outlined in Elements of this unit:
You should also demonstrate the following foundation skills
You also must be able to demonstrate essential knowledge required to effectively complete tasks outlined in elements and performance criteria of this unit, manage tasks and manage contingencies in the context of the work role.
This includes knowledge of:
In continuation to the previous Assessment Task 2, in this part, you are required to conduct a meeting with administration staff to check that new copyright, privacy policies and procedures and code of ethics and professional conduct are followed properly. You need to ask range of questions to understand administration staff knowledge related to updated documents.
Administration staff roles will be played by trainer/assessor. You will play a role of the Information Security Manager. Trainer/assessor will swap the roles to perform multiple conversations. Students will be assessed individually for their participation for this assessment task.
Based upon the updated policies, procedures, code of ethics and professional conduct documents from Summative Assessment Task 2, develop a grievance procedure for any IP stakeholder complaint.
You need to include below information in your grievance procedure:
This assessment aims to evaluate the student’s ability to apply intellectual property (IP), ethics, and privacy policies in ICT environments through both observation/demonstration and practical tasks. It requires showcasing professional knowledge, communication, and procedural compliance within workplace scenarios.
The mentor first guided the student through the purpose and format of the assessment, clarifying that it involved both a practical role-play simulation and a written report. The student was encouraged to review organizational policies and relevant legislation before beginning to ensure an informed and professional approach.
The mentor helped the student understand the context playing the role of an Information Security Manager.
Guidance was provided on:
How to set up a professional meeting environment.
Framing open-ended questions to test staff understanding (e.g., processes for client confidentiality, third-party data sharing, and identity verification).
Demonstrating effective communication, active listening, and ethical awareness during the interaction.
The mentor conducted mock discussions to help the student practice clarity in questioning, tone, and professionalism before the final observation.
During the live demonstration, the student performed the role-play, addressing all key questions about compliance with copyright, privacy, and ethical standards.
The mentor observed and assessed:
The student’s confidence and clarity in communication.
Knowledge of relevant legislation.
Ability to handle workplace scenarios involving data protection and stakeholder communication.
Feedback was provided immediately after, highlighting strengths (e.g., use of proper terminology and confident delivery) and areas for minor improvement.
Next, the mentor guided the student through the structure and content of the grievance procedure report.
The student was instructed to:
Start with an overview of the purpose of the grievance process.
Define roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.
Outline clear steps with timelines for resolving complaints.
Include escalation mechanisms if the issue remains unresolved.
The mentor emphasized clarity, conciseness, and alignment with the organization’s updated policies and code of ethics from the previous assessment.
Before submission, the mentor helped the student review the report for logical flow, policy alignment, and professional tone. The student cross-checked legislative references and ensured compliance with academic formatting requirements.
By completing this assessment under guided mentorship, the student successfully:
Looking for guidance on how to structure your own assignment? You can download this sample solution to understand the right approach, formatting, and academic tone expected in your coursework. However, please remember that this file is provided for reference and study purposes only. Submitting it directly as your own work may result in plagiarism issues or academic penalties.
If you want a unique, 100% plagiarism-free, custom-written solution, our team of professional academic writers can craft it exclusively for you. Each assignment is researched, written, and checked for originality to match your topic, university guidelines, and deadline ensuring top-quality results every time.
Disclaimer: This sample solution is intended solely for reference and learning. Direct submission of this content without modification may violate your institution’s academic integrity policy.
Download Sample Solution Order Fresh Assignment
© Copyright 2025 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.