FPC002B: Ethics and Professionalism in Financial Advice-Analysis Task - Accounting and Financial Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Learning outcomes (LO) mapping

1. Explain the role of ethical frameworks and professional standards within the financial planning profession.

2. Assess the impacts of cognitive, judgement and decision biases on financial advisers and their clients.

3. Presentation and referencing style

Analysis task presentation and referencing

You are required to research beyond the subject notes in answering the questions in this analysis task. Reference and cite all your sources when quoting or using material from external sources. Include a reference list at the end of your analysis task.

You are required to:

• use an appropriate presentation and format for your analysis task

• demonstrate independent research and analysis

• demonstrate appropriate use of relevant references

• follow the Harvard referencing style as recommended in Kaplan Australia: Harvard Referencing Guide available from the ‘Build Your Skills’ hub in KapLearn

• include a reference list at the end of your analysis task that follows the recommended referencing style

• adhere to the analysis task word limit.

Question 1 (| Word limit: 300 words)

Define the following two (2) barriers to ethical decision making, and include brief examples of how these barriers or biases could adversely affect a financial adviser’s decision making when providing financial advice:

(a) rationalisation

(b) confirmation bias

Questions 2, 3 and 4 are based on the case study below.

Don works as a financial adviser in a practice with three other advisers. They each own 25% of the business, and while they each look after their own clients, they do share back office, paraplanning and administration support within the practice. As with many other advice practices, Don and his partners are developing and refining their work processes to ensure they are compliant with the Code of Ethics, and are determined to position their advice practice at the pinnacle of ethical standards in the profession.

Geoff has been a close friend of Don since their teenage years and has sought Don’s advice on a range of financial issues including his superannuation and personal insurances. Don has never asked friends or family about their financial affairs and has only ever dealt with them when they have approached him. While Don and Geoff have discussed financial issues in general in the course of their friendship over many years, Don has never explicitly provided Geoff with financial advice.

As Geoff has recently proposed marriage to Don’s sister Emily, he wants to get his financial affairs in order before the wedding later this year. Geoff has provided Don with his latest superannuation statement and a couple of payslips, and suggested to Don that he call his accountant Michael to get a copy of his latest tax return. Michael, also a friend of Don, has been his accountant for many years, and it was Don that referred Geoff to Michael about five years ago.

Geoff says he trusts Don without question. He has also told Don not to worry about all the paperwork he normally has to provide to clients and will just do whatever he tells him to do. As a friend and soon to be relative, it is unlikely that Geoff will take any formal action against Don in the event of a dispute, so Don is considering just telling Geoff what he needs to do to sort out his financial affairs rather than working with Geoff through the formal advice process.

Question 2 (| Word limit: 300 words)

Using an ethical framework or theory and the facts presented in the case study, discuss ethical considerations for Don in taking Geoff on as a client.

Question 3 (| Word limit: 150 words)

At the latest practice partners meeting, all four partners agreed from an ethical point of view that they should not provide advice to their own family members or close friends. Instead, they would organise for one of the other advisers in the practice to provide financial advice in these situations. In line with this arrangement, Don has referred Geoff onto Anita, who is one of the other advisers in the practice. Don has stepped back and has not taken part in the advice process between Geoff and Anita.

A week after Geoff has begun to implement Anita’s advice, the practice support manager comes to ask Don a quick question. During this discussion, she mentions in passing that Geoff’s insurance applications have all been accepted without any concerns raised by the insurance underwriters. This surprises Don, as he is well aware that five years ago, Geoff injured his knee quite seriously while they were playing squash together. In Don’s professional judgement, he would have expected the insurance underwriters to have placed some exclusion or conditions on Geoff’s insurances due to the damage to Geoff’s knee.

As Don was not a part of the advice process, he assumes that Geoff discussed this information with Anita and that it was appropriately disclosed to the insurer. Don sees this as a good outcome for Geoff and decides to take no action.

Define motivated blindness and discuss how it may have influenced Don’s ethical decision making and how this blind spot could or should be avoided.

Question 4 (| Word limit: 300 words)

Evaluate and explain, with reference to the case study facts and the relevant legislation, if the financial adviser (Don) has acted in the best interests of the client (Geoff). In your discussion also provide comment on whether Don has acted in the best interests of the financial planning profession.

Question 5 (| Word limit: 450 words)

(a) Briefly explain the difference between a profession and a professional, and whether (providing examples) all participants must be professional to be regarded as a profession. (10 marks)

(b) Discuss whether financial planning should be regarded as a profession and the potential barriers to this recognition.

This FPC002B - Accounting and Finance has been solved by our Phd Experts at My Uni Papers. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK and US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.