CSM80011: Detailed Assessment and Design Proposal Assignment

Project Overview

Your group, as the main stakeholder of the proposed development project at 18 Patterson Street, Carnegie, has been provided with the preliminary town-planning drawings prepared by the architect.
Additionally, the survey plan of the existing building has been provided.

Assignment Requirements

Your group is required to prepare a comprehensive report addressing the following components:

1. Evaluation of Town-Planning Drawings and Building Classification (10%)

• Evaluate the provided town-planning drawings for the proposed development.

• Determine the building class in accordance with the National Construction Code (NCC).

• If multiple building types exist, list each building and its corresponding classification.

2. Evaluation of Footing Systems (25%)

• Using the proposed levels in the town-planning drawings and the survey plan of the existing property, evaluate various footing systems discussed in Lecture Week 8.

• Discuss the applicability, suitability, and feasibility of each footing system for the proposed development.

• Justify your choice with relevant engineering and soil condition considerations.

3. Selection and Evaluation of Wall Type (25%)

• Identify and discuss the wall type you intend to use in this project.

• Provide a comparative analysis of your selected wall type against other available wall types.

• Clearly explain the reasons for your selection, including factors such as:

  • Structural performance

  • Thermal efficiency

  • Acoustic performance

  • Cost and sustainability

4. Selection and Evaluation of Floor Type (20%)

• Evaluate and discuss the floor type you plan to use for the first floor of the development.

• Provide a comparison with other floor types and explain your selection based on:

  • Load-bearing capacity

  • Cost-effectiveness

  • Thermal and acoustic properties

  • Construction efficiency

5. Construction Sequence (10%)

• Based on your responses from Points 1–4, outline a detailed construction sequence for the proposed development after obtaining a building permit.

• The sequence should clearly present the step-by-step stages of construction from site preparation to project completion.

6. Sustainable Material Selection (10%)

• Identify and discuss at least three (3) sustainable materials that could be implemented in the proposed project.

• For each material, provide:

  • Advantages

  • Disadvantages

  • Challenges associated with their adoption in construction projects.

• Examples may include recycled concrete, cross-laminated timber (CLT), or green insulation materials.

Additional Instructions

• Form a group of 2 to 3 members.

• Prepare a 5-minute group presentation summarizing your report findings in Week 12.

• The report must be clear, concise, and logically structured.

• Avoid contradictions or inconsistent arguments—these will result in negative marking.

Report Formatting Guidelines

• Use a formal academic writing style.

• Include appropriate headings and subheadings for each section.

• Use Times New Roman or Calibri (12 pt) font and 1.5 line spacing.

• Include page numbers and student names in the footer.

• Cite all references using the Harvard Referencing Style.

Assessment Summary

The CSM80011 – Assignment 2 (Semester 2, 2025) required students to develop a detailed technical report for a proposed development project at 18 Patterson Street, Carnegie. Acting as the project’s main stakeholders, students were provided with preliminary town-planning drawings and the survey plan of the existing building.

The purpose of this assessment was to apply theoretical and practical construction knowledge to a real-world scenario by evaluating planning documentation, selecting appropriate construction systems, and proposing sustainable materials.

The report needed to address six major components:

1. Evaluation of Town-Planning Drawings and Building Classification (10%)

   • Assess drawings and determine building class per the National Construction Code (NCC).

   • Identify and list multiple building classifications if applicable.

2. Evaluation of Footing Systems (25%)

   • Examine footing systems discussed in lectures.

   • Assess applicability and suitability for the site using soil and level data.

3. Selection and Evaluation of Wall Type (25%)

   • Choose a preferred wall type and justify selection based on structural, thermal, acoustic, cost, and sustainability factors.

4. Selection and Evaluation of Floor Type (20%)

   • Evaluate suitable flooring options for the first floor.

   • Compare structural capacity, cost, thermal performance, and construction efficiency.

5. Construction Sequence (10%)

   • Develop a step-by-step construction sequence from site preparation to completion once the building permit is obtained.

6. Sustainable Material Selection (10%)

   • Identify three sustainable materials (e.g., recycled concrete, CLT, or green insulation).

   • Discuss their advantages, disadvantages, and implementation challenges.

Additional requirements included forming groups of 2–3 members, preparing a 5-minute presentation in Week 12, and ensuring clarity, conciseness, and logical structure in the report using Harvard referencing.

Academic Mentor’s Guidance and Step-by-Step Approach

The academic mentor supported the student group by structuring the assessment process into a systematic learning and execution plan to ensure both technical accuracy and alignment with course learning outcomes.

Step 1: Understanding the Project and Assessment Intent

• The mentor began by explaining the objective — to apply theoretical construction knowledge in a practical setting.

• Students were guided to carefully analyse the town-planning drawings and survey plan to understand site conditions, existing structure, and proposed changes.

• Emphasis was placed on critical evaluation, not mere description.

Step 2: Evaluating Town-Planning Drawings and Building Classification

• The mentor explained how to reference the National Construction Code (NCC) for identifying correct building classifications.

• Students learned to distinguish between Class 1, 2, and 5 buildings and justify classifications based on function and design.

• A comparative table was suggested for clarity in reporting.

Step 3: Assessing and Selecting Footing Systems

• During Week 8’s content review, the mentor revisited different footing systems such as raft slabs, strip footings, and pile foundations.

• Students compared each system against soil type, load requirements, and cost efficiency.

• The mentor guided them to select the most suitable and sustainable option and justify it using engineering principles.

Step 4: Wall Type Evaluation

• The mentor demonstrated how to conduct a comparative analysis between wall systems — e.g., reinforced concrete walls, timber-framed walls, and masonry cavity walls.

• Students were encouraged to evaluate each based on energy efficiency, acoustic insulation, fire resistance, and material availability.

• The chosen wall system was then justified with data and research support.

Step 5: Floor Type Selection

• The mentor guided the group to compare timber floors, reinforced concrete slabs, and composite floor systems.

• The decision-making process included evaluating load-bearing capacity, construction time, and long-term maintenance.

• The mentor stressed referencing structural design codes and practical feasibility.

Step 6: Construction Sequence Development

• Students were instructed to create a logical construction workflow, beginning with site clearing, followed by foundation, framing, wall erection, roofing, finishing, and inspection.

• The mentor ensured that all steps aligned with standard building permit protocols and safety requirements.

Step 7: Sustainable Material Research

• The mentor facilitated discussions on the use of sustainable materials such as cross-laminated timber (CLT), recycled concrete aggregates, and low-carbon steel.

• Students evaluated each material’s environmental benefits, limitations, and local adoption challenges.

• The mentor emphasized including life-cycle analysis considerations and referencing contemporary construction research.

Step 8: Report Structuring and Presentation Preparation

• The mentor provided a report structure template emphasizing professional formatting, Harvard referencing, and clear visual presentation.

• Guidance was given on preparing concise presentation slides summarizing findings for Week 12.

• The group was advised to conduct a peer review to ensure clarity and consistency across sections.

Outcome and Learning Objectives Achieved

Through guided mentoring and collaborative research, the student group successfully delivered a comprehensive and technically accurate project report. The outcomes achieved included:

• Technical Competence:
  Students demonstrated proficiency in evaluating construction documentation, selecting suitable structural systems, and applying NCC classifications.

• Critical Analysis:
  Each system (footing, wall, floor) was critically compared, showcasing analytical decision-making based on performance, cost, and sustainability.

• Sustainability Awareness:
  Students integrated eco-friendly materials and discussed realistic implementation barriers — aligning with global sustainability goals.

• Professional Communication:
  The report and presentation reflected clarity, conciseness, and logical flow using Harvard referencing and academic conventions.

• Collaborative and Reflective Learning:
  The mentoring approach promoted teamwork, reflective thinking, and the ability to connect theoretical knowledge to practical engineering contexts.

By the end of the assessment, students successfully met all course objectives by demonstrating a clear understanding of construction planning, system evaluation, and sustainable design integration in a real-world project setting.

Get Inspired by Expert Solutions – But Stay Original!

Looking for guidance on how to approach your academic assignment? You’re in the right place! Our free sample solutions are designed to help you understand structure, formatting, and academic writing techniques used by top-performing students. However, remember that this file is for reference and learning purposes only — submitting it as your own work may lead to plagiarism penalties from your institution.

To ensure your submission is 100% original, plagiarism-free, and tailored to your topic and university guidelines, our team of professional academic writers can create a custom-written assignment solution just for you. With years of expertise in diverse academic fields, our writers ensure high-quality, well-researched, and properly referenced papers delivered right on time.

Why Order a Fresh Solution?

• Custom-written content based on your specific requirements.

• Guaranteed plagiarism-free and Turnitin-checked reports.

• Written by qualified subject-matter experts.

• Delivered before your deadline with complete confidentiality.

• Hassle-free revisions and 24/7 student support.

Make the smart move learn from samples, but submit your own original work!

Disclaimer: The sample solution provided is for reference purposes only. It should not be submitted as your own academic work.

[Download Sample Solution] | [Order Fresh Assignment]