Highlights
Task
Question 1.
Part A
(a) Matters that could pose threat to MYA’s auditor independence
1. If Imprezza purchases a data analytics tool from MYA to use for revenue decision-making purposes, MYA’s use of the same tool to audit revenue during the year-end audit could cause a self-review threat.
2. The audit fees from Imprezza are currently a large proportion (2020: 25%, 2021: 26%) of
MYA’s total fees and the additional fee from either performing the audit of the 30 June 2020 summary financial statements or selling the data analytics tool will increase fees.
(b) New engagement
(i) The applicable Standard is ISA 810 (Revised) / ASA 810 / ISA (NZ) 810 (Revised) Engagements to Report on Summary Financial Statements. The work requested is to report on a summary set of annual financial statements derived from the most recently audited set of financial statements (30 June 2020).
(ii) The three parties to the engagement are:
(c) Changes to the assessment of risk of material misstatement
The changes required are:
Part B
(a) Key assertion addressed by each procedure.
(b) Inappropriate procedure for Imprezza’s 30 June 2021 audit Procedure P22 is not appropriate for the 30 June 2021 Imprezza audit. This procedure is a test of controls and as the audit plan for cash indicates a high control risk, a test of controls should not be performed.
Question 2:
Part A
(a) Procedure AP1
• Use the flowchart contained in the CSG to evaluate the control testing results.
• Apply the facts with reference to the tolerable deviation rate and planned audit approach in your answer.
• Consider the impact of the audit findings on initial audit planning.
(b) Control deficiencies in the new supplier process.
Part B.
(a) Workpaper
(i) The three errors in the work performed are:
1. The amount recorded in the fixed assets register (FAR) should not be compared to the purchase order amount.
2. The acquisition date recorded should not be the purchase order date.
3. The conclusion should not have compared the difference to 10% of performance materiality.
(ii) There is a difference of $20,000, which is above the clearly trivial threshold ($1,000) so an adjustment is required.
(b) Audit procedure P2
Part A:
(a) Revised summary of misstatements
This Accounting and Finance Assignment has been solved by our Accounting and Finance Expert at My Uni Papers. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.