Assessment Event 2: Land and Environment Court

Assessment Task Overview

For this assessment you will be given a statutory valuation court case to research and create a 10-minute PowerPoint presentation to give to the class.

The presentation is to include a summary of the case, the relevant heads of compensation, and anything else that you deem relevant to the case.

Your presentation must contain a critical analysis on the outcomes, benefits, or subsequent changes brought about by the case. You must support your critical analysis by including at least one (1) reliable research source that has been published by academic and/or property valuation experts, obtained through academic research processes.

A PDF copy of your presentation must be submitted via Turnitin by the due date to be advised in class and on the subject Moodle.

Submission Requirements

• A 10-minute (+ or – 10%) in-class PowerPoint presentation.

• Include a summary of the case, the relevant heads of compensation, and anything else that you deem relevant to the case.

• Include a critical analysis of the outcomes, benefits, or subsequent changes brought about by the case.

• Include at least one (1) reliable research source that has been consulted, cited, and referenced in your submission to support your critical analysis.

• A reference list must be included at the end of your report, using the TAFE NSW Harvard AGPS referencing style.

• Your presentation and written submission must be free from spelling and grammatical errors.

• You must submit a PDF copy of your presentation via Turnitin on the subject Moodle before the specified due date and time.

Summary of Assessment Requirements

This assessment required students to research a statutory valuation court case and prepare a 10-minute PowerPoint presentation summarising the key details of the case. The main objectives were to:

• Provide a comprehensive summary of the selected court case.

• Identify and explain the relevant heads of compensation associated with the case.

• Include any additional information deemed relevant to understanding the case context.

• Deliver a critical analysis of the outcomes, benefits, and any subsequent legal or procedural changes influenced by the case.

• Support the analysis with at least one reliable academic or professional research source related to property valuation.

• Compile and submit the presentation as a PDF file via Turnitin on Moodle before the due date.

• Ensure proper referencing using the TAFE NSW Harvard AGPS citation style and maintain accuracy in grammar and formatting.

The assessment thus aimed to evaluate the student’s ability to research, analyse, and present complex legal and valuation-related concepts clearly and professionally.

Academic Mentor’s Step-by-Step Guidance Approach

The academic mentor adopted a structured and supportive approach to guide the student throughout the assessment process. The guidance was divided into clear phases, ensuring that each assessment criterion was met systematically.

Step 1: Understanding the Assessment Requirements

The mentor began by explaining the purpose and scope of the task, emphasizing the importance of selecting an appropriate statutory valuation court case. The student was guided to understand that the focus was not merely on summarizing the case but also on demonstrating critical thinking through analysis and evaluation.

The mentor helped the student break down the task into manageable sections—case summary, heads of compensation, critical analysis, and referencing—to ensure clarity and direction.

Step 2: Case Selection and Initial Research

The mentor guided the student in selecting a suitable court case that aligned with valuation and compensation principles under relevant legislation. The importance of choosing a case with available public judgments and scholarly commentary was highlighted to enable effective research and citation.

The mentor introduced academic databases and legal research tools to help the student locate credible information sources such as:

• Legal databases (e.g., AustLII, LexisNexis)

• Academic journals on property valuation and compensation law

• Government and professional valuation bodies’ publications

The student was encouraged to maintain research notes to track references and key findings.

Step 3: Structuring the Presentation

Once sufficient research material was gathered, the mentor guided the student on how to structure the PowerPoint presentation logically. The recommended structure included:

1. Introduction: Brief overview of the court case and its significance.

2. Case Background: Description of the factual context, involved parties, and legal issues.

3. Heads of Compensation: Explanation of compensation categories (e.g., market value, disturbance, severance).

4. Critical Analysis: Evaluation of the judgment’s implications, benefits, or resulting legal reforms.

5. Conclusion: Key takeaways and lessons learned.

6. References: Properly formatted sources using Harvard AGPS referencing style.

The mentor also discussed the importance of using visual elements, concise bullet points, and speaker notes to maintain audience engagement during the presentation.

Step 4: Conducting Critical Analysis

The academic mentor emphasized the difference between descriptive and analytical writing. The student was guided to move beyond summarizing facts by addressing key analytical questions such as:

• What was the Court’s reasoning behind its decision?

• How did this decision affect property valuation practices?

• Did the judgment set any new legal precedents?

• Were there identifiable benefits or limitations resulting from the case outcome?

To strengthen the analysis, the mentor encouraged the inclusion of at least one academic or professional commentary for instance, research from a property valuation expert or legal scholar discussing compensation principles.

The mentor also reviewed drafts of the analytical section, providing feedback on coherence, argument strength, and clarity of expression.

Step 5: Applying Proper Referencing and Citation

The mentor provided a short tutorial on using the TAFE NSW Harvard Citation Generator to ensure accurate in-text citations and reference formatting.

Examples of correct citation techniques were demonstrated, covering both direct quotations and paraphrased ideas. The mentor stressed that appropriate referencing not only strengthens academic integrity but also enhances the credibility of the research presented.

Step 6: Presentation Design and Delivery Practice

In the final preparation phase, the mentor guided the student through the design principles of an effective PowerPoint presentation. This included:

• Limiting text per slide for clarity.

• Using relevant visuals, charts, or excerpts from the court judgment.

• Maintaining a consistent font, color scheme, and layout.

The mentor then conducted a mock presentation session, allowing the student to practice timing, tone, and clarity of delivery. Constructive feedback was given on communication style, pacing, and slide transitions to ensure the 10-minute presentation was well-rehearsed and confident.

Step 7: Final Review and Submission

Before submission, the mentor helped the student perform a final review checklist covering:

• Spelling and grammar accuracy.

• Proper formatting of references.

• Verification that the PDF file was correctly saved and ready for Turnitin upload.

The mentor reiterated the importance of adhering to academic honesty and avoiding plagiarism. The student successfully uploaded the final presentation to Moodle within the required timeframe.

Outcome and Learning Achievements

Through this structured mentoring approach, the student was able to:

• Develop a clear understanding of statutory valuation processes and compensation principles.

• Demonstrate critical thinking and analytical skills in evaluating court judgments.

• Strengthen academic research and referencing abilities using reliable and scholarly sources.

• Improve presentation and communication skills suitable for professional and academic contexts.

• Gain confidence in applying theoretical knowledge to real-world property valuation cases.

The final presentation effectively captured the legal, economic, and procedural aspects of the chosen court case, showcasing both analytical depth and professional delivery.

Conclusion

This assessment not only tested the student’s ability to research and present legal and valuation concepts but also fostered essential academic competencies such as critical reasoning, research literacy, and professional presentation.

The academic mentor’s systematic, step-by-step guidance ensured that the student met all assessment requirements while achieving the broader learning objectives of analytical evaluation, applied legal understanding, and scholarly communication within the field of property valuation.

Get Expert Guidance for Your Academic Success

Looking for reliable help with your assignments? You can download the sample solution provided on this page to understand how to structure, research, and present your work effectively. This sample has been prepared by academic experts to serve as a reference and learning aid, helping you grasp key concepts, formatting styles, and analytical approaches.

However, please remember that submitting this sample as your own work may lead to plagiarism issues. The file is meant strictly for reference and study purposes only.

If you need a fresh, 100% plagiarism-free assignment tailored to your topic, our team of professional academic writers is here to help. We deliver custom-written, well-researched, and properly referenced solutions that meet your university’s academic standards, ensuring originality, clarity, and high quality.

Take control of your grades with expert support today!

Why Order a Fresh Custom Solution?

• Completely original and plagiarism-free work

• Written by qualified academic professionals

• On-time delivery before your deadline

• Proper referencing and formatting (Harvard, APA, MLA, etc.)

• Confidential, safe, and student-friendly service

Download Sample Solution 

Order Fresh Assignment