Assessment 3: Ignite Presentation And Discussion

Assessment Description

As A Graduate Registered Nurse, You May Be Exposed To Situations Within The Clinical Setting Where You May Question The Legal And Ethical Responsibilities/Actions Of A Colleague And/Or Question The Specific Care/Management Of A Patient.

In This Presentation, Using The Coroner’s Case Provided, You Should Therefore Reflect On Professional, Legal And Ethical Issues That Impact On The Decisions Made By Nurses When Planning, Implementing And Evaluating Nursing Care.

You Should Consider How Certain Factors In The Case Provided Might Relate To:

• The Nursing And Midwifery Board Of Australia (NMBA) Nursing Standards

• NMBA Code Of Conduct

• International Council Of Nurses (ICN) Code Of Ethics

• NSQHS Standards

Review The Coroner’s Case You Have Been Allocated (Students Will Receive Their Coroner’s Case Allocation Via Teams In Week Five) And Identify Any Legal, Ethical, Quality And Safety Issues Involved In The Death Of The Patient, Reflecting Upon Your Own Knowledge Acquired From Your Theoretical Education And Clinical Experience Thus Far.

The Following Aspects Should Be Considered In Your Presentation:

• A Brief (Concise) Overview Of The Background And Context Of The Case

• How This Case Might Relate To The NMBA Standards, NMBA Code Of Conduct And/Or The ICN Code Of Ethics, NSQHS Standards

• Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Recommendations To Lessen The Likelihood Of Further And Similar Outcomes

Ignite Presentation 

You Should Consider These Points When Preparing Your Presentation:

Outline Only The Main Points.
Do Not Try To Include All The Detail. Look At The Marking Rubric To See What You Should Consider Including. Be Concise And To The Point.

Decide On Your Points Before You Make Slides.

Practice, Practice, Practice!

Remember To Breathe And Have Pauses Don’t Try To Talk Too Fast.

Don’t Depend Too Much On The Content On The Slides : Keep To Just One Or Two Points Per Slide.
Make The Slides Flexible Enough That If You Fall Behind You Are Not Going To Lose Your Place And Become Flustered.

Make Your Talk Fault-Tolerant:
Allow For Falling Behind, Getting Ahead Of The Slides Etc. As Above, Be Flexible.

Watch Some Ignite Talks To See How They Work.

This Link Expands On These Points:

You May Also Find The Following Links Useful.

Guidelines For Success

Please Include:

Case Study Number And Page Number From Your Text

Chang, E., & Hatcher, D. (Eds.). (2024).
Transitions In Nursing: Preparing For Professional Practice (6th Ed.). Chatswood: Elsevier.
ISBN 9780729543040.

Discussion

The Word Limit For Each Assessment Is 1000 Words (+/- 10%).

Whilst There Are A Series Of Questions Associated With Each Case Study, This Is A Reflective Essay And Should Be Structured In Essay Format (Introduction, Body And Conclusion).

The Questions Should Be Used To Guide The Content Of Your Essay And Help You Reflect On The Case Study.

Avoid The Use Of Direct Quotes Unless Very Pertinent And, If Used, Keep Them Short And Appropriately Referenced Using APA Guidelines.

Direct Quotes In General Do Not Demonstrate Your Understanding Of The Topic.
It Is Preferable To Discuss The Topic In Your Own Words.

References

Use Current APA Guidelines.

Any References Used Should Be Cited In-Text.
References Not Cited In-Text Should Not Appear In The Reference List.

The Use Of Evidence To Support Your Arguments Should Include Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles Beyond The Textbook. These Should Be Cited In-Text.

Submission Details

Submission Date Two: Friday 11th April At 1200Hrs

How To Submit

You Are Required To Upload Your Work To LMS For Assessment Two And Four As Outlined In The Assessment Details.

You Are Required To Submit Your Work By Checking The Student Declaration Box And Then Clicking The Submit Button.

Once You Upload Your Required Document To The Assessment Submission Area, This Is Classified As Your Own Work And You Are Agreeing To The Submission.

Work Submitted To LMS Cannot Be Revoked And Is Final.

No Submissions After The Deadline Are Accepted In LMS Unless Prior Approval Is Granted As Per The Extension Requirements.

How It Is Assessed

You Will Be Assessed On These Key Criteria:

• Evidence Of Critical Thinking And Clear Understanding Of The Topic With Links To Current Evidence-Based Nursing Practice.

• Evidence Of The Synthesis Of Relevant And Current Research To Support Discussion.

• Integration Of Critical Reflection On Personal Experience To Support Discussion.

The Assessment Includes A Moderation Process To Ensure Reliable, Just, And Fair Outcomes.

Please See The NUR359 LMS Page For All Assessment Marking Rubrics.

Brief Summary of the Assessment Requirements

This assessment requires students to analyse an allocated coroner’s case and prepare an Ignite Presentation along with a reflective written discussion. The focus is on examining the legal, ethical, professional, quality, and safety issues influencing nursing practice in the case.

Students are expected to:

• Provide a concise overview of the case background and clinical context

• Identify ethical, legal, and professional breaches or concerns

• Relate the findings to:

  • NMBA Registered Nurse Standards for Practice

  • NMBA Code of Conduct

  • ICN Code of Ethics

  • NSQHS Safety and Quality Standards

• Reflect on how nursing decisions influenced patient outcomes

• Recommend evidence-based nursing practices to prevent recurrence

• Demonstrate critical reflection using theory and clinical experience

• Present key points concisely using the Ignite presentation format

The reflective essay must:

• Be structured as Introduction, Body and Conclusion

• Stay within 1000 words (+/- 10%)

• Use APA-style in-text citations and reference list

• Include peer-reviewed scholarly sources beyond the textbook

Assessment will be graded on:

• Critical thinking and understanding of legal, ethical and professional practice

• Integration of evidence-based literature

• Ability to reflect on personal and professional learning

• Clarity, coherence, and academic writing quality

How the Academic Mentor Guided the Student

The Academic Mentor supported the student through the task using a structured and scaffolded approach, ensuring understanding at each stage.

Step 1 : Interpreting the Assessment Brief

The mentor first guided the student to:

• Read and interpret key expectations

• Highlight important assessment keywords

• Identify required standards and ethics frameworks

The mentor explained:

• This is not a narrative case summary

• The focus is on professional judgement, accountability and safety

• Reflection must include links to practice and evidence

Outcome of this stage:

• The student clearly understood the purpose of the task

• The case was approached from a professional responsibility lens

Step 2 : Analysing the Coroner’s Case

The student was guided to review the case critically, focusing on:

• Timeline of clinical decisions

• Communication processes

• Documentation quality

• Handover and escalation of care

• Monitoring and assessment practices

The mentor encouraged the student to identify:

• Missed opportunities

• Unsafe or unethical decision-making

• Breaches in duty of care

• System-based contributing factors

The student also reflected on:

• Their own clinical experiences

• How similar situations may arise in real-world nursing practice

Outcome of this stage:

• The student identified legal, ethical and safety issues with strong contextual understanding.

Step 3 : Mapping Issues Against Professional Standards

The mentor helped the student align case findings with:

• NMBA RN Standards for Practice

• NMBA Code of Conduct

• ICN Code of Ethics

• NSQHS standards

The student prepared structured links such as:

• Which standards were upheld or breached

• Where accountability and professional judgement were compromised

• How quality and safety systems failed

Outcome of this stage:

• The student demonstrated professional insight and regulatory awareness.

Step 4 : Developing Evidence-Based Recommendations

The mentor guided the student to move beyond critique and propose improvements, including:

• Strengthening clinical handover processes

• Improved patient monitoring and escalation protocols

• Reflective professional accountability

• Interdisciplinary communication improvements

• Ongoing professional development and supervision

Recommendations were supported using:

• Peer-reviewed nursing literature

• Clinical governance research

• Current evidence-based practice guidelines

Outcome of this stage:

• The student produced practical, research-driven recommendations.

Step 5 : Structuring the Reflective Essay

The mentor helped shape the essay into:

1. Introduction

   • Purpose of assessment

   • Brief case context

   • Scope of reflection

2. Body

   • Ethical and legal analysis

   • Links to NMBA & ICN standards

   • Quality and safety implications

   • Evidence-based recommendations

3. Conclusion

   • Key reflections

   • Professional learning

   • Implications for future practice

The mentor reinforced:

• Avoid over-quoting

• Prioritise personal interpretation

• Maintain reflective tone grounded in evidence

Outcome of this stage:

• The student produced a coherent and academically structured reflection.

Step 6 : Preparing the Ignite Presentation

The mentor guided the student to:

• Extract only key insights

• Convert complex content into concise slide points

• Maintain one or two core ideas per slide

• Rehearse narration and pacing

Focus areas included:

• Professional learning

• Ethical accountability

• Patient safety outcomes

Outcome of this stage:

• The presentation was clear, concise, and aligned to assessment expectations.

Final Outcome and Learning Objectives Achieved

By completing the assessment with guided academic mentoring, the student:

• Strengthened skills in professional reflection

• Demonstrated understanding of legal and ethical nursing practice

• Applied NMBA and ICN professional frameworks

• Integrated research-based nursing evidence

• Showed awareness of patient safety and clinical accountability

• Developed confidence in analysing coroner-reported clinical events

The task successfully supported learning in:

• Critical thinking

• Ethical decision-making

• Professional judgement

• Reflective nursing practice

• Safety and quality improvement

Download the Assignment Sample Use for Reference, Not Submission

Unlock deeper clarity and strengthen your understanding with our expertly written academic assignment sample. This solution has been prepared by qualified academic professionals and is made available to help you learn key concepts, improve structure and formatting, and gain confidence before working on your own submission.

However, we strongly advise students not to submit this sample as their own work. Universities use advanced plagiarism detection tools, and submitting copied content may lead to academic penalties. This file is meant strictly for reference, research, and learning purposes only.

If you need a fresh solution tailored to your topic and university guidelines, our expert writers can craft a 100% original, plagiarism-free assignment written from scratch and backed by credible academic research.

Why Order a Fresh Custom-Written Solution?

• Written exclusively for your topic and assessment requirements

• Guaranteed plagiarism-free content with originality report

• Structured as per your university marking rubric

• Expert subject-matter academic writers

• On-time delivery with revisions support

Use the sample to guide your learning and let professionals help when you need a fully customised academic solution.

Plagiarism Disclaimer:
The downloadable sample is provided for academic reference only. It should not be submitted as your own work in any form. Using copied content may result in academic misconduct.

Take the Next Step

[Download Sample Solution]    [Order Fresh Assignment]