A Study on Project Management Inefficiencies in Aviation Engineering Solutions Ltd

• Remember to use an academic paragraph structure.
• Read high ranking journals such as International Journal of Operations and Production Management for examples of good writing style.
• Remember to use Harvard Referencing to cite your sources. Every statement of fact must be supported by appropriate references. Review the library’s website for more information on correct referencing.

Guidelines

• This is a graded assignment.
• Submit your assignment by 27 October before 12:00 midday (UK time). Remember: it may take several minutes to upload your file so leave yourself plenty of time. Late assignments will be penalised.
• The word count for this assessment is 2,500 words +/- 10%. Submissions that exceed the word count will be penalised. The word count excludes the cover page, footnotes and reference list. Please include the word count on the cover page.
• You should use the Bath Harvard Referencing System. Review the library’s website for more information on correct referencing.
• Your assignment must be submitted in PDF format. (To save from Word to PDF select 'Save as Type' and select PDF from the drop down menu).
• Save your assignment using the following naming convention: UnitTitle_AssignmentTitle
• Do not include your name anywhere on your assignment. 
• This assignment uses plagiarism detection software. Remember to reference your work.
• Your feedback and grade will be made available in the Grades page 15 working days after the assignment due date. Your assignment grade is provisional, subject to approval by the Faculty Board of Studies following the Board of Examiners meeting, where your overall unit result will be confirmed.

Assessment Summary and Mentorship Approach

Brief Summary of Assessment Requirements

The assessment requires students to identify and analyse a single engineering business management issue within Aviation Engineering Solutions Ltd., and develop a 2,500-word research proposal offering an academic investigation into the chosen issue. Rather than solving multiple organisational problems, the focus must remain on one significant management issue, such as project management inefficiencies, supply chain constraints, workforce retention, or risk management gaps.

The assessment emphasises academic writing structure aligned with the standards of high-ranking journals like the International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Students are expected to apply the Bath Harvard Referencing System for all factual claims and literature citations. The word limit is strictly 2,500 words (+/-10%), excluding references, cover page, and footnotes. The submission must be made in PDF format before the deadline of 27 October (12:00 midday UK time).

Key pointers to be covered in the research proposal include:

1. Introduction – Define the organisation, background context, and problem statement.

2. Research Aim and Objectives – Clearly state what the study intends to achieve.

3. Literature Review – Critically analyse existing academic literature relevant to the chosen issue.

4. Research Methodology – Describe the research approach, data collection, and analysis methods.

5. Expected Outcomes and Implications – Outline the anticipated contributions and benefits.

6. Ethical Considerations – Address ethical principles in data handling and reporting.

7. Conclusion and Recommendations – Summarise findings and provide actionable insights.

Students must submit the assignment using the file naming convention UnitTitle_AssignmentTitle, ensuring no personal identifiers are included. Plagiarism detection tools will be applied, and all references must be appropriately cited.

Mentor-Guided Approach to Completing the Assessment

The academic mentor guided the student through a structured, step-by-step process, ensuring that each stage met the assessment standards and academic integrity expectations.

Step 1: Understanding the Assessment Context

The mentor began by explaining the purpose of the research proposal — to demonstrate critical thinking, academic research capability, and applied understanding of business management within the engineering domain. The mentor clarified that the proposal must focus on one management issue to ensure depth rather than breadth of analysis.

Step 2: Selecting a Suitable Research Topic

Through brainstorming sessions, the mentor helped the student narrow down potential issues within Aviation Engineering Solutions Ltd.. After evaluating various possibilities, the student selected “Project Management Inefficiencies” as the key area of investigation, owing to its relevance in operational performance, scheduling, and cost control.

Step 3: Structuring the Proposal

The mentor outlined the standard structure for an academic research proposal:

• Title Page and Word Count

• Abstract (Optional)

• Introduction

• Research Aim and Objectives

• Literature Review

• Research Methodology

• Expected Results

• Ethical and Practical Considerations

• Conclusion

• Reference List (Harvard Format)

Each section’s purpose and content expectations were discussed in detail.

Step 4: Developing the Introduction

The mentor guided the student in drafting an introduction that sets the organisational context, identifies key challenges in aviation engineering project management, and justifies the need for the proposed study. Emphasis was placed on maintaining an academic tone and avoiding generalisations.

Step 5: Framing the Research Aim and Objectives

The mentor demonstrated how to convert the main issue into a clear research aim, supported by three to four measurable objectives. These objectives guided the subsequent literature and methodology design.

Step 6: Conducting the Literature Review

Using academic databases, the mentor trained the student in sourcing peer-reviewed journals relevant to project management, aviation engineering, and organisational efficiency. The mentor emphasized critical analysis rather than descriptive writing, encouraging the student to compare scholarly perspectives, identify research gaps, and position the study within existing frameworks.

Step 7: Designing the Research Methodology

The mentor explained both qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. After reviewing feasibility, the student opted for a qualitative approach involving case analysis and secondary data review. The mentor advised on data collection ethics, validity, and reliability, ensuring alignment with the Bath referencing standards.

Step 8: Drafting Expected Outcomes and Ethical Considerations

The student, under mentor supervision, defined expected findings such as improved process visibility, enhanced resource allocation, and refined scheduling systems. Ethical considerations, including data confidentiality and academic honesty, were integrated as per institutional policy.

Step 9: Reviewing and Editing the Proposal

The mentor conducted multiple review sessions focusing on academic paragraph structure, coherence between sections, and appropriate in-text citations. Feedback was also provided on writing tone, use of transitional phrases, and avoidance of plagiarism.

Step 10: Final Formatting and Submission Preparation

The mentor ensured the final proposal adhered to:

• The Bath Harvard Referencing System.

• Correct PDF format.

• Required word count.

• Absence of personal identifiers.

• Logical flow and professional presentation.

The student was guided to conduct a plagiarism check and ensure all sources were properly cited before submission.

Outcome and Learning Objectives Achieved

By completing this assessment with academic mentorship, the student achieved several key learning outcomes, including:

• Analytical Thinking: Gained the ability to identify and dissect a single, complex business management issue in an engineering organisation.

• Research Competence: Developed proficiency in conducting literature reviews and applying theoretical frameworks from academic sources.

• Practical Insight: Understood how project management inefficiencies impact operational and financial performance in aviation engineering contexts.

• Academic Writing Mastery: Demonstrated capability in producing a structured, citation-rich, and academically sound research proposal.

• Ethical Awareness: Recognised the importance of research ethics, data integrity, and plagiarism prevention.

• Professional Presentation: Learned to prepare and submit a formal academic document following institutional formatting, referencing, and submission protocols.

Conclusion

The assessment served as a valuable learning experience that bridged academic theory and professional engineering management practice. Through step-by-step guidance from the academic mentor, the student successfully produced a well-structured, referenced, and academically robust research proposal addressing a real-world management issue in Aviation Engineering Solutions Ltd. This process not only fulfilled the assessment requirements but also enhanced the student’s research literacy, analytical thinking, and readiness for future professional challenges in the engineering management domain.

Get Inspired by This Sample – But Submit Your Own Original Work

Looking to understand how a well-structured academic assignment should look? You can download this sample solution to explore formatting, referencing, and writing style for guidance. This sample is meant strictly for reference and learning purposes only. Submitting it as your own work may lead to plagiarism penalties and academic misconduct — always ensure your submission is completely original.

If you need a custom-written, 100% plagiarism-free assignment, our team of professional academic writers is ready to help. Every assignment is tailored to your topic, academic level, and university guidelines to ensure quality, accuracy, and timely delivery.

Why Choose Our Fresh Assignment Writing Service:

• Guaranteed original and plagiarism-free content

• Expert writers from top academic fields

• Proper citations and referencing (as per your university style)

• Confidential, secure, and on-time delivery

• Free revisions to ensure complete satisfaction

Don’t risk your grades with copied content. Learn from the sample but let us craft a unique paper designed just for you.

[Download Sample Solution]  [Order Fresh Assignment]